On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Yes, I think it could be renamed as sgx.c. Should the driver part be
> also called as sgx.ko?
I guess that's your call guys. The reason why I asked is because I like
shorter names and "sgx" is unambiguous enough. AFAICT, there's no one
else doing SGX atm.
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
