On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:46 AM Peng Hao <peng.hao2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On some architectures (e.g. arm64), it's preferable to use MMIO, since > this can be used standalone. Add MMIO support to the pvpanic driver. > 0day complains b/c of 1st patch in the series. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> This wasn't suggested by me. It's your idea to support to MMIO. > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/misc/pvpanic.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c b/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c > index 49c59e1..22fb487 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ > > #define PVPANIC_PANICKED (1 << 0) > > -static u16 port; > +static void __iomem *base; > > static struct acpi_driver pvpanic_driver = { > .name = "pvpanic", > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ > static void > pvpanic_send_event(unsigned int event) > { > - outb(event, port); > + iowrite8(event, base); > } > > static int > @@ -80,7 +80,11 @@ > struct resource r; > > if (acpi_dev_resource_io(res, &r)) { > - port = r.start; > + base = (void __iomem *) ioport_map(r.start, > + r.end - r.start + 1); > + return AE_OK; > + } else if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r)) { > + base = ioremap(r.start, r.end - r.start + 1); > return AE_OK; > } > > @@ -101,7 +105,7 @@ static int pvpanic_add(struct acpi_device *device) > acpi_walk_resources(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, > pvpanic_walk_resources, NULL); > > - if (!port) > + if (!base) > return -ENODEV; > > atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list, > @@ -115,6 +119,8 @@ static int pvpanic_remove(struct acpi_device *device) > > atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&panic_notifier_list, > &pvpanic_panic_nb); > + iounmap(base); > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko