On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:04 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/03/2018 06:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> + EBLOCK = 0x9, > >> + EPA = 0xA, > >> + EWB = 0xB, > >> + ETRACK = 0xC, > >> + EAUG = 0xD, > >> + EMODPR = 0xE, > >> + EMODT = 0xF, > >> +}; > > Hmm... This E prefix confuses me with (system wide) error codes. Has > > it been discussed before? If so, can you point on the conclusion why > > the current format is good? > > Making them SGX_EWHATEVER isn't a horrible idea. +1 here. Namespace will not shadow SDM naming scheme. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
