Re: [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH v11 13/13] intel_sgx: in-kernel launch enclave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-06-20 11:16, Jethro Beekman wrote:
 > This last bit is also repeated in different words in Table 35-2 and
 > Section 42.2.2. The MSRs are *not writable* before the write-lock bit
 > itself is locked. Meaning the MSRs are either locked with Intel's key
 > hash, or not locked at all.

Actually, this might be a documentation bug. I have some test hardware and I was able to configure the MSRs in the BIOS and then read the MSRs after boot like this:

MSR 0x3a 0x0000000000040005
MSR 0x8c 0x20180620aaaaaaaa
MSR 0x8d 0x20180620bbbbbbbb
MSR 0x8e 0x20180620cccccccc
MSR 0x8f 0x20180620dddddddd

Since this is not production hardware, it could also be a CPU bug of course.

If it is indeed possible to configure AND lock the MSR values to non-Intel values, I'm very much in favor of Nathaniels proposal to treat the launch enclave like any other firmware blob.

Jethro Beekman | Fortanix

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux