On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:18:52 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:08 +0000, Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 3:55 AM > > > To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario > > > <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to > > > pure ACPI driver > > > > > > On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to linux-acpi. They are > > > > less likely > > > > to be overlooked by me then and the others on that list may have > > > > opinions on > > > > them too. > > > > > > Maybe we can update MAINTAINERS file for acpi based platform-x86 > > > drivers > > > to include linux-acpi list? Darren, Andy, any idea? > > > > > > > I would also wonder if the intel-vbtn driver should still live in > > platform-x86 as it's > > now pure ACPI driver with this change Andy proposed. > > > > Btw Andy for your v2 with your fixups that were in your review branch > > feel free > > to add: > > Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > > > When you resubmit it. > > Mario, Rafael clarifies the matter and NACKed this one (which kinda was > expected by me, that's why RFC was in the first place). > > I'm going to drop this patch from my queue. Thanks!
