Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: silead_dmi: Add entry for the Teclast X98 Plus II

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03-01-18 00:40, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:39:27PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:

>> Generally "testing" is the branch you want to base on if linus/master
>> doesn't work as the review-* branches *will* rebase frequently.
>> Exceptions exist of course, and this patch is just fine - just for
>> future reference.
>
>
> This is my "fault", I asked Paul to rebase on top of
> review-andy as that had 1 new silead_dmi patches missing
> from testing, so otherwise we would end up with a conflict when
> merging review branches. Same reason why I've been basing my
> silead_dmi patches on top of review-andy even though that is
> an unusual base to use.

Darren, in this case it's exceptional since there is a stream of a
patches against silead_dmi. They appear faster than older appear in
testing.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux