> -----Original Message----- > From: platform-driver-x86-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:platform-driver-x86- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Lutomirski > Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 1:33 PM > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Multiple MOF GUID's > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:30 AM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andy, > > > > I was looking at a system that will have many more WMI methods, and realizing > that I can't > > view the bmof for the extra methods. This is because of b0e863029 which will > show a warning > > when multiple of the same WMI GUID's are found. > > The same GUID 05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910 is used to describe > each one of them. > > So there are multiple WMI instances, both of which have bmof? Yep. > > > > > I think the symlinks in sysfs will break if the warning is just removed. > > > > So what should we do about this? I think they should both be accessible from the > bmof driver from > > userspace. > > Fixing it will require changing the data structures to get rid of the > global wmi_block_list. I don't think it'll affect the ABI. I'll > gladly review a patch ;) > Alright I'll see what I can do.