RE: Multiple MOF GUID's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: platform-driver-x86-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:platform-driver-x86-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Lutomirski
> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 1:33 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Multiple MOF GUID's
> 
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:30 AM,  <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Andy,
> >
> > I was looking at a system that will have many more WMI methods, and realizing
> that I can't
> > view the bmof for the extra methods.  This is because of b0e863029 which will
> show a warning
> > when multiple of the same WMI GUID's are found.
> > The same GUID 05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910 is used to describe
> each one of them.
> 
> So there are multiple WMI instances, both of which have bmof?

Yep.

> 
> >
> > I think the symlinks in sysfs will break if the warning is just removed.
> >
> > So what should we do about this?  I think they should both be accessible from the
> bmof driver from
> > userspace.
> 
> Fixing it will require changing the data structures to get rid of the
> global wmi_block_list.  I don't think it'll affect the ABI.  I'll
> gladly review a patch ;)
> 

Alright I'll see what I can do.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux