On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:46 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:42:45 +0100 > > Source code review for a specific software refactoring showed the need > for another correction because the error code "-1" was returned so far > if a call of the function "sony_call_snc_handle" failed here. > Thus assign the return value from these two function calls also to > the variable "err" and provide it in case of a failure. > Applied to my review and testing queue, thanks! > Fixes: d6f15ed876b83a1a0eba1d0473eef58acc95444a ("sony-laptop: use soft rfkill status stored in hw") > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/31/463 > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<CAHp75VcMkXCioCzmLE0+BTmkqc5RSOx9yPO0ectVHMrMvewgwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c | 14 ++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c > index a16cea2be9c3..4332cc982ce0 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c > @@ -1660,17 +1660,19 @@ static int sony_nc_setup_rfkill(struct acpi_device *device, > if (!rfk) > return -ENOMEM; > > - if (sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, 0x200, &result) < 0) { > + err = sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, 0x200, &result); > + if (err < 0) { > rfkill_destroy(rfk); > - return -1; > + return err; > } > hwblock = !(result & 0x1); > > - if (sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, > - sony_rfkill_address[nc_type], > - &result) < 0) { > + err = sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, > + sony_rfkill_address[nc_type], > + &result); > + if (err < 0) { > rfkill_destroy(rfk); > - return -1; > + return err; > } > swblock = !(result & 0x2); > > -- > 2.14.3 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko