Hi,
On 27-10-17 12:41, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:31:01PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 27-10-17 12:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 26-10-17 22:33, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
The fusb302 driver as merged in staging uses "typec_fusb302" as i2c-id
rather then just "fusb302" and needs us to set a number of device-
properties, adjust the intel_cht_int33fe driver accordingly.
One of the properties set is max-snk-mv which makes the fusb302 driver
negotiate up to 12V charging voltage, which is a bad idea on boards
which are not setup to handle this, so this commit also adds 2 extra
sanity checks to make sure that the expected Whiskey Cove PMIC +
TI bq24292i charger combo, which can handle 12V, is present.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
I can't apply this one. Is there an immutable branch I need to pick up?
Or shall this go via another tree? My base is v4.14-rc5.
It should be applied on top of this patch:
http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/commitdiff/5c003458db40cf3c89aeddd22c6e934c28b5a565
From linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/for-next.
So either we are going to need an immutable branch from you
with the first patch of this series so that the platform/x86
maintainers can merge this, or the other way around :|
Alternatively we could push this patch as a post rc1 fix I guess.
I intentionally did not push out yet until this was cleared. So, I think
the most simple option is that I create an immutable branch with only
the i2c patches from you. Then linux-platform maintainers can pull in
my branch and your patch here on top of that. Would be my favourite.
D'accord everyone?
Works for me, ack.
Regards,
Hans
