> The first patch, although it is an i2c-core change, is really > quite simple. I believe anyone can review it. But it does need > someone other then me to take a proper look (and not just do > a code only review) because it is a core change. Maybe there > is another way to solve the problem (persistent / predictable > device-names for i2c devices instantiated through board-data), > but I don't think so. My plan is to hopefully meet Mark Brown (SPI and regulator maintainer) at ELCE next week and have a chat with him about this series. If all goes well, I'll merge it for v4.15.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
