On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The functions cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047 and cht_int33fe_find_max17047
> are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make
> them static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047' was not declared. Should it be
> static?
> symbol 'cht_int33fe_find_max17047' was not declared. Should it be static?
Pushed to my review queue, thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
> index 94716b2fbc00..286c6207765d 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct cht_int33fe_data {
> * These helpers are used to work around this by checking if an i2c-client
> * for the max17047 has already been registered.
> */
> -int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +static int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct i2c_client **max17047 = data;
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void)
> +static struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void)
> {
> struct i2c_client *max17047 = NULL;
>
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
