Quoting Hans de Goede (2017-09-19 11:35:50) > Hi, > > On 09/08/2017 05:54 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > On 2017-09-08 17:45, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> From: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Sometimes drivers only use muxes under certain scenarios. For > >> example, the chipidea usb controller may be connected to a usb > >> switch on some platforms, and connected directly to a usb port on > >> others. The driver won't know one way or the other though, so add > >> a mux_control_get_optional() API that allows the driver to > >> differentiate errors getting the mux from there not being a mux > >> for the driver to use at all. > >> --- > >> Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt | 1 + > >> drivers/mux/core.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> include/linux/mux/consumer.h | 4 ++ > >> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > >> > >> I haven't tested this patch, and hence I have not signed it and I also > >> removed the sign-off from Stephen... > > > > Huh, I definitely intended to mention that this patch is based on [1] > > from Stephen, but that I've made changes according to the comments in > > that thread (and more). And those changes are what made me remove the > > sign-off from Stephen... > > AFAIK normally a Signed-off-by is kept if some (small-ish) changes > are made. The S-o-b is mostly an indication that the author is > ok with adding the code to the kernel under the GPL. > > Anyways, Stephen are you ok with re-adding your S-o-b to > the version modified by Peter? > Please add my sign off Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@xxxxxxxxxx> and I would expect Peter to have one as well with a maintainer tag indicating what changed from my patch.
