Hi Hans, On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 16-08-17 22:28, Liam Breck wrote: >> >> Hi Hans, >> >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> On some devices the USB Type-C port power (USB PD 2.0) negotiation is >>> done by a separate port-controller IC, while the current limit is >>> controlled through another (charger) IC. >>> >>> It has been decided to model this by modelling the external Type-C >>> power brick (adapter/charger) as a power-supply class device which >>> supplies the charger-IC, with its voltage-now and current-max >>> representing >>> the negotiated voltage and max current draw. >>> >>> This commit adds support for this to the bq24190_charger driver by >>> calling >>> power_supply_set_input_current_limit_from_supplier helper if the >>> "input-current-limit-from-supplier" device-property is set. >>> >>> Note this replaces the functionality to get the current-limit from an >>> extcon device, which will be removed in a follow-up commit. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Changes in v2: >>> -Wait a bit before applying current-max from our supplier as >>> input-current-limit >>> the bq24190 may still be in its power-good wait-state while our >>> supplier is >>> done negotating current-max and if we apply the limit to early then the >>> input-current-limit will be reset to 0.5A by the bq24190 after its >>> power-good wait is done. >>> --- >>> drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c | 35 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c >>> b/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c >>> index f13f892..6f75c8e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c >>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c >>> @@ -159,9 +159,11 @@ struct bq24190_dev_info { >>> struct extcon_dev *extcon; >>> struct notifier_block extcon_nb; >>> struct delayed_work extcon_work; >>> + struct delayed_work input_current_limit_work; >>> char model_name[I2C_NAME_SIZE]; >>> bool initialized; >>> bool irq_event; >>> + bool >>> input_current_limit_from_supplier; >>> struct mutex f_reg_lock; >>> u8 f_reg; >>> u8 ss_reg; >>> @@ -1142,6 +1144,32 @@ static int >>> bq24190_charger_property_is_writeable(struct power_supply *psy, >>> return ret; >>> } >>> >>> +static void bq24190_input_current_limit_work(struct work_struct *work) >>> +{ >>> + struct bq24190_dev_info *bdi = >>> + container_of(work, struct bq24190_dev_info, >>> + input_current_limit_work.work); >>> + >>> + power_supply_set_input_current_limit_from_supplier(bdi->charger); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void bq24190_charger_external_power_changed(struct power_supply >>> *psy) >>> +{ >>> + struct bq24190_dev_info *bdi = power_supply_get_drvdata(psy); >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * The Power-Good detection may take up to 220ms, sometimes >>> + * the external charger detection is quicker, and the bq24190 >>> will >>> + * reset to iinlim based on its own charger detection (which is >>> not >>> + * hooked up when using external charger detection) resulting in >>> a >>> + * too low default 500mA iinlim. Delay setting the >>> input-current-limit >>> + * for 300ms to avoid this. >>> + */ >>> + if (bdi->input_current_limit_from_supplier) >>> + queue_delayed_work(system_wq, >>> &bdi->input_current_limit_work, >>> + msecs_to_jiffies(300)); >>> +} >>> + >>> static enum power_supply_property bq24190_charger_properties[] = { >>> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_TYPE, >>> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH, >>> @@ -1170,6 +1198,7 @@ static const struct power_supply_desc >>> bq24190_charger_desc = { >>> .get_property = bq24190_charger_get_property, >>> .set_property = bq24190_charger_set_property, >>> .property_is_writeable = bq24190_charger_property_is_writeable, >>> + .external_power_changed = bq24190_charger_external_power_changed, >>> }; >>> >>> /* Battery power supply property routines */ >>> @@ -1651,6 +1680,8 @@ static int bq24190_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >>> mutex_init(&bdi->f_reg_lock); >>> bdi->f_reg = 0; >>> bdi->ss_reg = BQ24190_REG_SS_VBUS_STAT_MASK; /* impossible state >>> */ >>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bdi->input_current_limit_work, >>> + bq24190_input_current_limit_work); >>> >>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, bdi); >>> >>> @@ -1659,6 +1690,10 @@ static int bq24190_probe(struct i2c_client >>> *client, >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> + bdi->input_current_limit_from_supplier = >>> + device_property_read_bool(dev, >>> + >>> "input-current-limit-from-supplier"); >>> + >> >> >> Maybe >> if (device_property_read_bool(dev, >> "linux,input-current-limit-from-supplier")) { >> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bdi->input_current_limit_work, >> bq24190_input_current_limit_work); >> bdi->input_current_limit_from_supplier = true; // or use a field >> in bdi->input_current_limit_work as the flag? >> } > > > Done, except for making the flag a field in input_current_limit_work, > input_current_limit_work is of type struct delayed_work so I cannot just > add a field. What I meant was you could check an existing field in delayed_work to see if it was init'd. >> Also should document property for DT use assuming Sebastian is ok with >> new power_supply method. > > Also done for v3 of this patch. > >> And can you rebase to my pending series in next pass? There's nothing >> controversial in it :-) > > > I've cherry-picked v3 of the patch adding the dt-binding-doc to my tree so > that I could add the documentation for the property on top. I will make sure > to rebase on top of the rest once the rest is merged by Sebastian (otherwise > I need to rebase after each revision of the patch-set). Sounds good.