On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 08:43 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > On Aug 2, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@l > > > > inux.intel.com> wrote: > > > NAK. guid_block is a firmware interface, so opaque kernel types > > > don't > > > belong in it. > > > > I f we leave this, what do you think about everything else? > > Assuming it works, it's fine with me. I'd be happy to test. Just sent v2. > Keep in mind that this beast is a *little-endian* GUID abomination, > and I don't see generic conversion helpers. Something might need to > be added. Do you mean something like char16_to_guid() / char16_to_uuid() ? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy
