On Wednesday 05 July 2017 21:30:35 David Airlie wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Chun-Yi Lee" <jlee@xxxxxxxx>, "Corentin Chary" > > <corentin.chary@xxxxxxxxx>, acpi4asus-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > > "Dave Airlie" <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Oleksij Rempel" > > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "João Paulo Rechi Vita" > > <jprvita@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Darren Hart" <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andy Shevchenko" > > <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, > > platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Wednesday, 5 July, 2017 7:51:13 PM > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method > > instance number > > > > On Saturday 17 June 2017 18:47:54 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > So problematic drivers which use instance=1 without any comments > > > > are: > > > > acer-wmi > > > > asus-wmi > > > > mxm-wmi > > > > > > Adding authors & maintainers of those drivers in loop. > > > > Hi! > > > > Dell drivers and acer-wmi are fixed now. So only asus-wmi and > > mxm-wmi needs to be investigated. > > > > Adding more people who developed those drivers recently in loop. > > Can you check if instance number is used correctly or not? > > I've no memory of why I picked 1 or 0, I probably cut-n-paste it from > somewhere else. > > Dave. And do you have at least ACPI DSDT dumps from that machine? Or are you able to find some? -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
