On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:45:56PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:46:12PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 19:22:46 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > > > >> Pali Rohár found that there have some wmi query/evaluation > > > >> code that they used 'one' as the first WMI instance number. > > > >> But the number is indexed from zero that it's must less than > > > >> the instance_count in _WDG. > > > >> > > > >> This patch changes those instance number from one to zero. > > > >> > > > >> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Looks good, Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Unfortunately patchwork ignores this tag. > > > So, in the future please: > > > - put a tag on a separate line > > > - do _not_ prepend it by any characters including white spaces > > > (except new line :-) ) I see! I will also follow the rules in the future. > > > > I have not known that those lines are parsed automatically. > > Will do it in future! > > :-) Thanks! > > For reference, Patchwork tally's such things in the patch list view: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/platform-driver-x86/list/ > > And, selfishly, the more normalized these are, the less likely Andy and I are to > make mistakes manipulating them into the patches. > Joey Lee