On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:32:48 Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Michał Kępień <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > What we still need, though, is an open source version of >> > wmiofck.exe. I am unaware of anything like that existing and >> > installing the Windows Driver Kit just to run one command which >> > spits out a single *.h file is not something I would describe as >> > convenient (been there). >> >> I haven't tried to see whether they do what's needed, but there's >> OpenWBEM and OpenPegasus. >> >> Anyway, if such a tool exists, it would be handy to expose the binary >> MOF data to userspace so the tool could be used to help get WMI >> working on new platforms. > > In this case, when WMI stay in kernel, MOF data could be exported via > debugfs? I think there is no need to have them in sysfs stable ABI. As > above usage (get WMI working on new platforms) looks like for debugging > purpose. > That's a reasonable point.
