> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Darren, Andy, > > > > > > Please drop this patch series for now. I will send a rebased v2 after a > > > long overdue patch series from Alan Jenkins gets applied in a reworked > > > form. > > > > Noted. > > > > Just for you information. Our repo now consists three branches: fixes, > > for-next, and testing. testing is kinda for internal use, it might be > > broken or be in a wrong state. > > Better to use for-next as a base. For this cycle (which is my first as > > In general, you should be able to use Linus' master as the base. Only if you > require patches already in for-next, should you use for-next. Thanks, guys, this is all helpful information. I have always assumed testing was the correct base branch because my patches got pushed there once they got accepted. -- Best regards, Michał Kępień