On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 15:57 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> > These patches specifically enable the audio MCLK required by Baytrail >> > CR devices. It is the remaining part of a bigger set of patches >> > (already merged in Mark Brown's tree) that enable sound for Baytrail >> > CR >> > devices (especially Asus T100TAF) [1]. They include the clock driver >> > and clock enabling in the pmc_atom code (along with moving of the >> > non-architectural pmc_atom driver code into drivers/platform/x86 as >> > suggested by Thomas Gleixner [2]). This move includes a new header in >> > include/linux/platform_data/x86/. While there is an agreement that the >> > definitions for PMC clocks are not really platform data this location >> > is seen as a good-enough compromise with an agreement between Darren >> > Hart and Andy Shevchenko [3] >> > >> > [1] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-August/1 >> > 11704.html >> > [2] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-October/ >> > 113936.html >> > [3] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December >> > /115892.html >> > >> >> Stephen, I see no issues with the patches. If you want to push them >> through your tree, take a tag from PDx86 subsystem point of view: > > Does PDx86 == platform device x86? Yes. > I can provide a stable branch > in clk tree for platform tree, or platform x86 maintainer can ack > the platform/x86 patches and I can take the whole batch through > clk tree. That's what I did. Do you need Darren's one? >> >> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
