Re: [PATCH v2] platform: x86: Support Turbo Boost Max 3.0 for non HWP systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 12:38 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 14:40 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 10:29 -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > > 
> > >  
> > > +
> > > +static int itmt_legacy_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > +	static u32 max_highest_perf = 0, min_highest_perf =
> > > U32_MAX;
> > Should the max_highest_perf and min_highest_perf be defined and
> > initialized
> > outside this function?  Otherwise the max and min value will be lost
> > and reset
> > each time a new cpu comes online.
> > 
> > We will always find max_highest_perf == min_highest_perf.
> Perhaps you missed static keyword there. Their behaviour is the same as
> for global variables, i.e. the initial value assigned only at the
> beginning.
> 

Yes I did miss the static modifier. Sorry for the noise.

Tim



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux