Re: [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:42 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > 
> > From: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd generation (2014) ships with BIOS that
> > will
> > return HKEY interface version 0x200. It needs thinkpad-acpi support
> > otherwise it will be routed to wrong branch and the hotkey mask
> > will
> > be wrong.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114731
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 35
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > index dad2984..c177936 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > @@ -3357,11 +3357,8 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct
> > ibm_init_struct *iibm)
> >  	   A30, R30, R31, T20-22, X20-21, X22-24.  Detected by
> > checking
> >  	   for HKEY interface version 0x100 */
> >  	if (acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hkeyv, "MHKV", "qd")) {
> > -		if ((hkeyv >> 8) != 1) {
> > -			pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY
> > interface: 0x%x\n",
> > -			       hkeyv);
> > -			pr_err("please report this to %s\n",
> > TPACPI_MAIL);
> > -		} else {
> > +		switch (hkeyv >> 8) {
> > +		case 1:
> >  			/*
> >  			 * MHKV 0x100 in A31, R40, R40e,
> >  			 * T4x, X31, and later
> > @@ -3381,6 +3378,34 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct
> > ibm_init_struct *iibm)
> >  			} else {
> >  				tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1;
> >  			}
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		case 2:
> > +			/*
> > +			 * MHKV 0x200 in X1
> > +			 */
> > +			vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT |
> > TPACPI_DBG_HKEY,
> > +				"firmware HKEY interface version:
> > 0x%x\n",
> > +				hkeyv);
> > +
> > +			/* Paranoia check AND init hotkey_all_mask
> > */
> > +			if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle,
> > &hotkey_all_mask,
> > +					"MHKA", "dd", 1)) {
> > +				pr_err("missing MHKA handler, "
> > +					"please report this to
> > %s\n",
> > +					TPACPI_MAIL);
> > +				/* Fallback: pre-init for
> > FN+F3,F4,F12 */
> > +				hotkey_all_mask = 0x080cU;
> > +			} else {
> > +				tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1;
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> 
> Why do you duplicate this code block with that single byte changed?
> If
> that was intended, then it certainly should be explained.

I didn't, I re-sent one of Shuduo's patches.

In any case, it seems that the patch breaks a few devices that appeared
after the Lenovo Carbon X1 2014. This is discussed, in a few separate
threads, on the ibm-acpi list:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.ibm-acpi.devel

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux