On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:58:40PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > Hi Darren, > > Thanks for review, see also my comments below. > > On 08.03.2016 13:39, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:38:36PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c > >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp-wmi.c > >> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int __init hp_wmi_rfkill_setup(struct platform_device *device) > >> (void *) HPWMI_BLUETOOTH); > >> if (!bluetooth_rfkill) { > >> err = -ENOMEM; > >> - goto register_wifi_error; > >> + goto register_bluetooth_error; > > > > In this and all cases below, the goto label should match the situation, jumping > > to register_bluetooth_error would be incorrect as we experienced a wifi error. > > Here we experienced an BT error - BT rkill allocation failed, > so jump is to "register_bluetooth_error". > > The second jump to "register_bluetooth_error" is in another case of BT error: > when its rfkill registration failed. > > It is the same label since if BT rfkill allocation had failed > rfkill_destroy(bluetooth_rfkill) call in cleanup does nothing but we still > need to possibly unregister WiFi rfkill that might have been registered in > a previews block (and then fall through to next label to destroy WiFi rfkill). > > It would be possible to have separate jump labels skipping unnecessary > rfkill_destroy() calls on allocation failure, but this would mean > that we would have 7 labels in such small block of cleanup code. My apologies, I read through this too quickly. The patch is correct as is. I have wrapped the commit message at 75 characters and queued to the testing branch. The one thing that's missing in the commit message is a description of how this was failing. It can, however, be inferred. Thanks for the patient reply, I deserved a slap for my initial response. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html