On Tuesday 19 January 2016 10:03:03 Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Pali, > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:36:33 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 08:54:26 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > @@ -978,11 +978,11 @@ int dmi_walk(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *), > > > > u8 *buf; > > > > > > > > if (!dmi_available) > > > > - return -1; > > > > + return -ENOENT; > > > > > > -ENOSYS would seem more appropriate? > > > > IIRC -ENOSYS is for non implemented syscalls. > > I can see a lot of -ENOSYS in include/linux/*.h returned by stubs when > a specific subsystem is not included. Not related to syscalls at all. > This is what lead to my suggestion. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/22/492 -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
