> Jean, am I right that drivers must not store pointers to DMI tables > that they find through dmi_walk? Is there any alternative interface > that could be used to get a longer-lived pointer to DMI tables, or > should drivers just parse them and copy out any info needed from the > dmi_walk callback? The easiest long term solution might be to just map the dmi buffer once and keep it. It's not that huge so it's not a big address space hog. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html