On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 09:58:13PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Currently the driver prints "*not supported" if any of the features
> queried are in fact not supported, let us print the available
> features instead.
>
> This patch removes all instances pr_info printing "*not supported",
> and add a new function called "print_supported_features", which will
> print the available laptop features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index d983dc4..66b596a 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void toshiba_illumination_available(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> pr_err("ACPI call to query Illumination support failed\n");
> else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> - pr_info("Illumination device not available\n");
> + return;
> else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS)
> dev->illumination_supported = 1;
> }
> @@ -483,7 +483,6 @@ static void toshiba_illumination_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
> pr_err("ACPI call for illumination failed\n");
> return;
> } else if (result == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> - pr_info("Illumination not supported\n");
> return;
> }
I mentioned this in the previous review. For several of these, we have an if
statement that checks for a condition, and then returns, which is exactly what
would happen if we didn't have the if statement at all.
If the context is important, a comment should be sufficient. Is there a
compelling reason to add the redundant check?
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
