On Monday 06 July 2015 15:43:28 Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:35:40AM +0800, Alex Hung wrote: > > ATK4001 is an ACPI device for wireless hotkey, similar to how Dell and > > HP are doing it. It is just ASUS who decides LED should be controlled > > by software unlike HP whose LED is driven by hardware pins on mini > > card. > > Alex, please refrain from top posting on Linux kernel mailing lists, it breaks > the established practice the readers are setup for. > > Regarding the ATK4001 device, it did sound like it did more than control the > radios and the associcated LED. If that is all it does, then asus-rbtn is fine. > If it does something beyond that, we need understand what that is, as a more > platform-centric name would be more appropriate. > > Thanks, Yes, I understand too that ATK4001 device has more functions as one for LED control. And in this case it is not good to use name from one specific functionality. And about name: I chose name rbtn for dell driver because ACPI device in DSDT table is named RBTN and acpi id is DELRBTN. I think that acpi-rbtn.c (radio button) is not ideal name for driver which at SW level controls LED device associated with wireless devices. I would rather follow acpi device name, but in this case ATK4001 is even worse name which does not say anything... Maybe better name could be asus-wireless? Still I do not have any good name, so choose something... -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
