On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 26 June 2015 23:24:10 Alex Hung wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 10:57:51 Alex Hung wrote:
> > >> ASUS introduced a new approach to handle wireless hotkey
> > >> since Windows 8. When the hotkey is pressed, BIOS generates
> > >> a notification 0x88 to a new ACPI device, ATK4001. This
> > >> new driver not only translates the notification to KEY_RFKILL
> > >> but also toggles its LED accordingly.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >> +static int asus_radio_led_set(bool blocked)
> > >> +{
> > >> + acpi_status status;
> > >> + union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
> > >> + struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, &arg0 };
> > >> + unsigned long long output;
> > >> +
> > >> + arg0.integer.value = blocked;
> > >> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(asus_rbtn_device->handle, "HSWC",
> > >> + &args, &output);
> > >
> > > What is this ACPI call doing? Just set LED control? Or something more?
> > >
> > >> + if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status) || output == 0) {
> > >> + pr_err("fail to change wireless LED.\n");
> > >> + return -EINVAL;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> + return 0;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +static int asus_rfkill_set(void *data, bool blocked)
> > >> +{
> > >> + radio_led_state = blocked ? 0 : 1;
> > >> +
> > >> + return asus_radio_led_set(radio_led_state);
> > >> +}
> > >
> > > In my opinion this is not good idea that "rfkill block" call from
> > > userspace just change LED on/off state and nothing more...
> > >
> > > If above ACPI call just change LED, then should not be this in LED
> > > subsystem instead rfkill one? Or why do you prefer to use rfkill
> > > interface instead led?
> >
> > It indeed controls LED only at the moment. My intention was to have
> > have everything work without the need to modify any userspace
> > applications. Current it is 1) aus-rbtn issues KEY_RFKILL 2) an
> > userspace application changes rfkill states, and 3) both radio and LED
> > work. It will also work when a user enable/disable wireless devices
> > on a user application which uses rfkill interface.
> >
> > Come to think about it now, I may have to handle LED with WLAN and BT
> > but I will have to find a system with both devices later.
> >
> > I am not too familiar with userspace applications v.s. LED. Is it
> > possible to do the same (i.e. without touching userspace)? I think
> > rfkill is good interface to handle whatever needs doing when changing
> > wireless states, such as LED controls. However, if other approach can
> > meet the need I am happy to investigate.
> >
>
> There are triggers for led which automatically enable/disable led. I
> think that configuring default wifi/bluetooth trigger for that new led
> could work...
>
I agree with Pali. If all we're doing is changing LED state, this sounds like a
job for a LEDs trigger.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
