On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:12:38PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote: > The rfkill notifier node names are used in three different places. As a > matter of style, it is better to store them somewhere and have the > compiler warn us about typos in the function arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > index 6e3be01..e92ea41 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > @@ -819,11 +819,15 @@ static int eeepc_new_rfkill(struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc, > return 0; > } > > +static char EEEPC_RFKILL_NODE_1[] = "\\_SB.PCI0.P0P5"; > +static char EEEPC_RFKILL_NODE_2[] = "\\_SB.PCI0.P0P6"; > +static char EEEPC_RFKILL_NODE_3[] = "\\_SB.PCI0.P0P7"; So, out of curiosity, any particular reason for static char[] instead of #define? I see both used frequently and didn't see any advice in CodingStyle. Regardless, Queued and thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
