On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh >> <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So the question is: are there IBM models (or models that don't send >> KEY_MUTE, anyway) that nonetheless expose HAUM and SAUM? If not, then >> my patch should be okay. If so, we'll need further filtering. > > No, these were introduced in the X61/T61. Still, the standard paranoia > applies, and you should check for HAUM/SAUM only on VENDOR_LENOVO, and > assume they don't exist (because if they do, they are something else) for > VENDOR_IBM. Done in v3. My X220 seems to be alive again for the time being -- I suspect that there's a marginal connection somewhere. It seems to be fully functional with this match, and the mute light works as expected (thanks, Takashi et al!). --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
