On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:48:35AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Jan van den Berg wrote: > > I will try and make _real_ contribution next time. (With this being my > > first ever submission to the kernel: at least now I understand the kernel > > workflow.) > > There's nothing wrong with your patch by itself. And git does try to help > us take such patches (there's "git blame -w")... but ignoring whitespace > changes doesn't always work as well as one would like. > > That said, Darren has already queued your patch, and I am _not_ going to ask > him to drop it. So, as far as I'm concerned, the patch has been accepted, > and that's it. Henrique, Thanks for the feedback. I had considered rejecting the patch for the reason you describe, but opted to take it this time. I haven't established all my maintainer policies yet, so they will change a little over time as we find what works and what causes us more pain. Personally, I like to see the cleanups, but generally agree that cleanups should typically be [PATCH 1/X] of a series. Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
