> -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:44:26PM +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > > Hi Chen, > > I don't see such a warning with gcc 4.9.1. Which compiler are you using? > I'm using gcc 4.8.2 on Fedora20. Should we ignore the warning of old version of gcc? If not, I'll resend this with a detail commit message. Thanks for your help. - Chen > Please include these sorts of details (which compiler, etc.) when submitting > patches. I will never merge a patch without a complete commit message. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > > index bd533c2..738fc0c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > > @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sys_acpi(struct device *dev, int cm, > > const char *buf, size_t count) > > { > > struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > - int rv, value; > > + int rv, value = -1; > > > > rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value); > > Inspecting the code, I don't see how this could possibly result in the use of > an > uninitialized variable. > > -- > Darren Hart > Intel Open Source Technology Center ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n????⒐?腐z狂蟑??n?■???h?璀?｛?夸z罐?+€?zf＂?????i?????_璁?:+v??撸?
