On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:54:43PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > So this patch is only as a courtesy to clang and you're not complaining > about things like __builtin() functions, typeof, or a ? : b conditional > operators because clang happens to support them? That patch removes a disgusting construct; who cares how they'd discovered it? Consider it courtesy to reviewers, clang or no clang... Folks, it's C; no need to bring Pascal misfeatures in, even if gcc happens to accept them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
