On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, David Henningsson wrote: > Not sure if thinkpad_acpi should be dropped into include/linux > though, any better suggestion? I'm fine with it wherever... > Should TPACPI_VERSION be increased because we added a new LED driver? TPACPI_SYSFS_VERSION needs to be increased when you add some feature or change some behaviour that userspace needs to know to be present/ausent AND which cannot be detected by other means (such as the presence of a sysfs node). A good example is poll() support for sysfs nodes. If you need to bump TPACPI_SYSFS_VERSION, you absolutely must add the proper documentation for the feature to Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt. TPACPI_VERSION is mostly cosmetic, and adding the mute LED driver looks like as good a reason to bump it as any other. You need to at least describe the new functionality and bump the driver version and date in Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt. Other than that, it looks good from the thinkpad-acpi side. I'll ack it if you update Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html