Hi, Bjorn
Thank your advice .
I will modify my code, then try to submit again.
Bruce.Ma
May 29,2013
On 05/28/2013 06:28 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Bruce <bruce.ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> +struct blacklist lenovo_blacklist[] = {
>> + {
>> + .model_s = "Lenovo LM490s",
>> + .nummodel_s = "814YG01",
>> + },
>
> The driver already has a list of LED support per model in the
>
> static const struct tpacpi_quirk led_useful_qtable[] __initconst = {}
>
> array. Why do you duplicate this with lots of new model checking code
> instead of just using the code that's already there?
>
>> static void led_exit(void)
>> {
>> + if (no_led == 1 ) {
>
> The driver already has provisions for signalling that LEDs are
> unsupported through the 'led_supported' variable. Why do you add
> another variable, and duplicate testing in every access function?
>
> But I don't think this part is needed at all, as long as you set up the
> proper LED map in led_useful_qtable.
>
>
>
> Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
