Re: [PATCH 2/2] asus-wmi: update wlan LED through rfkill led trigger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:12 AM, AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Corentin,
>
> 2012/7/26 Corentin Chary <corentincj@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:34 AM, AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> For those machines with wapf=4, BIOS won't update the wireless LED,
>>> since wapf=4 means user application will take in chage of the wifi and bt.
>>> So, we have to update wlan LED status explicitly.
>>>
>>> But I found there is another wireless LED bug in launchpad and which is
>>> not in the wapf=4 quirk.
>>> So, it might be better to set wireless LED status explicitly for all
>>> machines.
>>>
>>> BugLink: https://launchpad.net/bugs/901105
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>> index a13eb45..6ddfb0b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>>> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ struct asus_wmi {
>>>         struct device *hwmon_device;
>>>         struct platform_device *platform_device;
>>>
>>> +       struct led_classdev wlan_led;
>>>         struct led_classdev tpd_led;
>>>         int tpd_led_wk;
>>>         struct led_classdev kbd_led;
>>> @@ -452,12 +453,20 @@ static enum led_brightness kbd_led_get(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>>>         return value;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static void wlan_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>>> +                        enum led_brightness value)
>>> +{
>>> +       asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_WIRELESS_LED, value, NULL);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void asus_wmi_led_exit(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>>>  {
>>>         if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(asus->kbd_led.dev))
>>>                 led_classdev_unregister(&asus->kbd_led);
>>>         if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(asus->tpd_led.dev))
>>>                 led_classdev_unregister(&asus->tpd_led);
>>> +       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(asus->wlan_led.dev))
>>> +               led_classdev_unregister(&asus->wlan_led);
>>>         if (asus->led_workqueue)
>>>                 destroy_workqueue(asus->led_workqueue);
>>>  }
>>> @@ -465,6 +474,7 @@ static void asus_wmi_led_exit(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>>>  static int asus_wmi_led_init(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>>>  {
>>>         int rv = 0;
>>> +       u32 result;
>>>
>>>         asus->led_workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue("led_workqueue");
>>>         if (!asus->led_workqueue)
>>> @@ -498,6 +508,17 @@ static int asus_wmi_led_init(struct asus_wmi *asus)
>>>                         goto error;
>>>         }
>>>
>>> +       asus_wmi_get_devstate(asus, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_WIRELESS_LED, &result);
>>> +       if (result & ASUS_WMI_DSTS_PRESENCE_BIT) {
>>> +               asus->wlan_led.name = "asus-wmi::wlan";
>>> +               asus->wlan_led.brightness_set = wlan_led_set;
>>
>> Why no brightness_get ?
> The return value from querying ASUS_WMI_DEVID_WIRELESS_LED  is not correct.
> In my machine, I'll get 0x00050003 when querying its status no matter
> the LED is on or off.

Could I take a look to the DSDT ?

> That's why I didn't provide a brightness_get() function.
>
>> (note that if you decide to add wl_led_get() function that returns
>> -ENODEV when not found (like for touchpad), please use directly
>> instead of checking devstate above).
> I'll wrap the devstate in a function, but won't provide a brightness_get()
> Is that okay?
>
>>
>>> +               asus->wlan_led.flags = LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME;
>>> +               asus->wlan_led.max_brightness = 1;
>>> +               asus->wlan_led.default_trigger = "asus-wlan";
>>> +               rv = led_classdev_register(&asus->platform_device->dev,
>>> +                                          &asus->wlan_led);
>>> +
>>> +       }
>>>  error:
>>>         if (rv)
>>>                 asus_wmi_led_exit(asus);
>>> @@ -811,6 +832,9 @@ static int asus_new_rfkill(struct asus_wmi *asus,
>>>         if (!*rfkill)
>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> +       if (dev_id == ASUS_WMI_DEVID_WLAN)
>>> +               rfkill_set_led_trigger_name(*rfkill, "asus-wlan");
>>> +
>>
>> I think this is only needed because leds are created before rfkill
>> switchs. You may also simply move rfkill_init() above led_init() (take
>> care of fail_led, fail_rfkill too).
>>
>> Another solution is to call led_trigger_set_default() instead of
>> rfkill_set_led_trigger_name()
> I tried to exchange rfkill_init() and led_init() only in asus_wmi_add(),
> and the LED didn't work anymore.

Hum, how it didn't work ? the order should not change anything, very strange...

> So, I think the current init sequence is correct and should not change it.
>
> And while calling led_classdev_register() in asus_wmi_led_init()
> it will call led_trigger_set_default() in the end of
> led_classdev_register() function.

I know, but here you have to set the trigger by name because the led
is registered before the rfkill trigger. led_trigger_set_default()
will do exactly the same thing, but selecting the trigger specified in
.default_trigger instead of using a name (thus, avoiding the need to
revert the led trigger patch).

>
> We still need to set the led trigger name to rfkill, so that our led function
> will be called when rfkill status is changed.
>
>>
>>>         rfkill_init_sw_state(*rfkill, !result);
>>>         result = rfkill_register(*rfkill);
>>>         if (result) {
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Corentin Chary
>> http://xf.iksaif.net
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> Chia-Lin Kao(AceLan)
> http://blog.acelan.idv.tw/
> E-Mail: acelan.kaoATcanonical.com (s/AT/@/)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux