El 23/07/12 15:28, Matthew Garrett escribió:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Miguel Gómez wrote:
1) reverting the patch in acpica that puts all names in uppercase
2) using a case-insensitive match in acpi bus driver
3) using uppercase name in classmate-laptop driver
I think the easiest and less risky way to fix this is by adding a
new hardware id (as proposed in the thread's patch), as it doesn't
add any side effects (that the other solutions might add), and it
doesn't break the behaviour of the old code.
I've lost track of the implementation state here - if all names are
upper-cased in acpica, why is this not already matching?
Names are upper-cased in acpica, so the device is reported as FNBT0000.
But in the driver it's named FnBT0000, and that's why it doesn't match.
--
Miguel Gómez
Igalia - http://www.igalia.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
