Hi, Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:18:28 +0200, Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Ike Panhc <ike.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I think platform-driver-x86 may not be the best mailing list for > > your patches. > > > > Please try to use scripts/get_maintainer.pl and it can tell you who > > you shall ask for reviewing. > > Like Ike said, this is the mainling list for drivers/platform/x86, not > arch/x86, and running get_maintainer.pl on your patchs will give you > the rights people to CC. Thanks for this information, it can be useful indeed. > > And btw, I'm not sure we really want to put all these drivers in > arch/x86/platform/ts5500/ a re-create the arm driver mess. > drivers/leds/, drivers/gpio/ and drivers/mtd/ are probably a best > choice. In fact, this set of patches is a rewrite of the first RFC set, where we discussed that arch/x86/platform/ could be a good place, as the TS-5500 is a specific platform with its platform devices (the corresponding thread is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/3/60). Regards, Vivien. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
