Il 03/06/2011 23:00, Dmitry Torokhov ha scritto:
The issue with that that we are breeding myriad of quirks
Where is the quirk? If many vendors provide the same feature let's
create a common interface for that.
that nobody
knows about
This is false, especially for (so many) people using Windows too, where
the feature is clearly visible by the OEM software.
and nobody ever uses.
Again, this is false, and I don't think you can speak for everybody.
X provides standardized way of
ignoring input devices.
Let's create a standardized solution, instead of using a standardized hack.
It is also more transparent than "I once wrote
something to some sysfs file and I completely forgot about this but
now my touchpad does not work".
The problem does not lie in the sysfs file, lies in the lack of
userspace software for it (BTW, about this case someone already created
a Vaio specific GUI for an easy control of these features).
There were quite a few bugs filed just
because users pressed key that cuts power to touchpad and stores the
state across reboots.
It's very much like saying that we should not produce cars because some
people use them improperly and crash. People doing wrong things will
always be present, we can improve userspace software to help them
instead, not just delete features they payed for (and they wanted to
use, at least once as you say).
(and why should we suppose that X will be used always and
forever?).
We should not but replacement should have at least the same functionality
if not better.
I agree, but this doesn't necessarily mean it will use an hack again.
It's a common and widespread feature, let's support it better instead of
just removing it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
