On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Hm. Do you have a summary or a pointer to that discussion? This really > > does seem to be a hardware monitoring device, and so hwmon would seem > > the more natural home for it - I'd like some idea of what the > > justification was. > > Basically that it has no interface features in common with anything in > the hwmon API, nor that looked likely to be generic or could be made to > fit them. > > hwmon isn't "any hardware monitoring device", it's classes of devices > that fit certain common interfaces - eg thermal reporting ones. But also voltage and current reporting ones, including alarm thresholds. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
