Am Freitag 17 Dezember 2010, 12:30:15 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Peter HÃwe <PeterHuewe@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch 15 Dezember 2010, 21:51:04 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > >> > Hi, another patch was posted before: > >> > > >> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/970/ma > >> > tch =acpi_wmi > >> >Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Yeah, you're right - but as Sedat's patch is perfect (and fixes both) - > > so for Sedats's patch: > > Acked-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx> > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > [ CC John Linville ] > > It's a bit disappointing to see my fix is still not in > platform-drivers-x86/linux-next [1] (even it's only fixing "warnings", > 9 days past). > linux-next tree is for me a very high dynamic SCM tree, I am doing > mostly daily builds, at weekend I am testing/pulling other trees > before they go into Monday's linux-next. > As far as I have fun with "my process"... I will continue. Added Stephen Rothwell on CC, maybe he can apply it directly to linux-next ;) Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
