On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:39:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > The case I'm worried about is where the graphics driver never gets > > into a mergable state and we end up with a pile of mainline code that > > can't sanely run on the hardware. As long as the plan is to get it to > > avoid duplicating the entire Intel modesetting code and including its > > own TTM then that seems fair enough, but Intel's track record on this > > side of things hasn't been great. > > I don't track the public DRM lists but the last I saw on that on the > archives was Keith Packard blocking patches to enable such a merge. > You'd have to ask him about it. On the acceleration side mrst/psb > graphics are not i9xx style. I'm really not terribly comfortable merging enabling code for an architecture if there's no clear plan for merging critical parts of that architecture. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
