Hi Lars,
We commit the fix in r5946 (https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/changeset/5946). Unregistration is not ideal indeed, unfortunately updating the Contact is rather complicated, especially if the Contact address has been rewritten by allow_contact_rewrite.
Regards,
Ming
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:51 AM Lars Olsson <lars.olsson76@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________I am setting custom parameters in pjsua_acc_config::contact_params.When applying a change to contact_params with pjsua_acc_modify, a reregistration is correctly triggered, but contact params are still the old ones. (not updated)Very simple patch is to handle it in the same way as for "forced_contact",--- a/pjsip/src/pjsua-lib/pjsua_acc.c Thu Mar 07 14:08:59 2019 +0100
+++ b/pjsip/src/pjsua-lib/pjsua_acc.c Thu Mar 07 17:45:28 2019 +0100
@@ -1020,6 +1020,7 @@
pj_strdup_with_null(acc->pool, &acc->cfg.contact_params,
&cfg->contact_params);
update_reg = PJ_TRUE;
+ unreg_first = PJ_TRUE;
}
But this causes a unregistration that I do no think is needed. It should be enough with doing a reregister. While testing, contact rewrite feature is disabled.
Best Regards,
Lars
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________ Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org