Re: Multiple TLS listeners

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Ming!

Regards
Giuseppe

On 9/28/18 3:26 AM, Ming wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe,
> 
> Right, it's been there for a while. Unfortunately, it's always bumped
> out by other higher priority items. Thanks for the upvote. We'll see
> if this can be included in our roadmap.
> 
> Regards,
> Ming
> 
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Giuseppe Ravasio
> <giuseppe_ravasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We noticed that PJSIP supports only a single TLS transport listener.
>>
>> I understand that this issue has been reported multiple times:
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2014-October/017905.html
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2015-January/018072.html
>> https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/1083
>>
>> Many years has gone by since the last report but I think that the need
>> for multiple TLS listeners is stronger than ever.
>> It could be great beeing able to use different certificates and
>> different TLS configuration!
>>
>> Giuseppe
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org

_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org

pjsip mailing list
pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux