Hi Chris, To be honest, we haven't looked further into it. The only thing we know is that at first glance, it already looks like the behavior that we currently have with our ICE. So if you have any insights or feedbacks (or implementation patches :) ), please feel free to share with us because basically we haven't started anything yet. Regards, Ming On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:54 AM chris coleman via pjsip <pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello PJSIP team, > > For Nansng and anyone else working on this Trickle ICE. > How’s it going with implementing it? > I noticed it was marked for 2.8 then slipped to next version 2.9 > Can you talk here about the implementation plan? > Which already functioning implementation are you borrowing into PJSIP? > Anything missing, any obstacle? > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org _______________________________________________ Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
