Sorry, I forgot to mention the pjsip revision I used for the test: URL: http://svn.pjsip.org/repos/pjproject/trunk Revision: 4291 On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:04 PM, mayamatakeshi <mayamatakeshi at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > I have found an issue with pjsip: it is unable to respond properly to > CANCEL requests if the branch ID parameter in the header Via is doesn't > comply with RFC3261 (meaning it should start with 'z9hG4bK'). > To confirm this, I used the attached sipp xml scenario. > As it is, the scenario will generate proper RFC3261 values for branch ID > and if I make a call to pjsua using it, the CANCEL request is properly > handled and I get "200 OK" for CANCEL and "487 Request Terminated" for the > INVITE. > However, if I change all branch IDs to something like branch=abcd, > pjsua/pjsip will reply to the CANCEL request with "SIP/2.0 481 > Call/Transaction Does Not Exist" > > Regards, > Takeshi > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20121102/9f5df7e5/attachment-0001.html>
