Using pjsua for android

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> What is your exact use case? Normally in android you should not need to
> deploy applications by other (complicated from user point of view) means.
Well, as I said before, I started compiling the source code given here:

http://svn.pjsip.org/repos/pjproject/branches/projects/android/

I must say that this branch doesn't provide any kind of .apk, so I
thought that I could directly execute the application
/pjsip-apps/src/pjsua. The make-file will output the binary (not the
.apk, though) in /pjsip-apps/bin. I must say that I've tried that
application on an Android Emulator, on an Android Rooted Emulator and
on a real device that hasn't been rooted yet (ie. cannot perform
strace etc.)... Maybe i'll try to root it.

Now, I've taken a look at android-ndk-r8b samples, and I've seen that
some "native-samples", such as native-activity, doesn't have to carry
any kind of .java code, even if they still have AndroidManifest.xml,
Android.mk, Applications.mk, which are missing on the
http://svn.pjsip.org/repos/pjproject/branches/projects/android/
original source code... Maybe I should recreate the same "file
architecture" on the official version?

> BTW, this said, the problem is maybe somewhere else.
I sincerely hope so...

  M.P.


On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:02 PM, R?gis Montoya <r3gis.3r at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> CSipSimple supports two backends for audio. One is the OpenSLES one (this
> one has been integrated and probably improved in pjsip android branch) and
> the other is the Java-JNI implementation.
> OpenSLES is only valid from 2.3 and is my default setting from android 3.0
> (because some manufacturers did crappy things). The jni implementation is
> used from android 1.6.
>
> If you dive in Android source code you'll see that both OpenSL-ES and Java
> api relies on the same thing so in terms of performance what you win is the
> garbage collection cycles and the fact there is no conversion to java arrays
> (which doesn't have such a big impact). Other benefit of OpenSLES is that it
> doesn't needs to keep a reference on the dalvik jvm and can be managed
> directly in C independently of context.
> If you want to try both options in CSipSimple, you can check the difference
> by changing a simple option.
> As OpenSLES (for now) rely on android media server, you are still
> constrained by same things than a regular app.
> Google engineers announced that they will rework libwilhelm (the one that
> implements opensl-es api) to use lower api libraries (such as
> libstagefright), but that's not yet the case, even in source code of 4.1...
> So we are waiting for real time audio...
>
> In terms of permission you are constrained to the same things than someone
> using the android audio server from a java app. Besides, normally even at
> lower layer they will take care to not open a door to apps. It's probably
> very easy to do by allowing rights to open audio device only to members of
> one group.
>
> Normally strictly talking about unix permission it should not be a problem
> since you are root when running your binary. However... I'm not fully sure
> that the android media server doesn't takes an exclusive lock on
> libstagefright. In which case your app running as binary would not be
> allowed to do anything. That's just an idea, as I said in my first mail I
> never tried that because it doesn't make many sense to have a pure binary
> app.
> The correct way to have a non platform app on android is to run it from an
> android application. And android application are apk. Apk are in charge to
> declare many things including permissions. And these permissions will indeed
> be applied to the sandboxed user.
>
> What you could do however, if you really want to go the way of the binary,
> is to package your binary inside your apk and to call it from a very simple
> java app with an execute.
>
> What is your exact use case? Normally in android you should not need to
> deploy applications by other (complicated from user point of view) means.
>
> BTW, this said, the problem is maybe somewhere else. I'll test soon apjsua
> so if I encounter same problem maybe I'll be able to provide more feedback
> :).
>
>
> On 25/07/2012 17:07, Monty Python wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your reply!!
>>
>> I tried to launch the same application on a not-rooted device, and it
>> gave me, unfortunately, the same result.
>>
>> I have also a question about CSipSimple. I've seen that that fork
>> required to use a java support, maybe in order to avoid the problems
>> with Android permissions', manifest files and so on. Anyway I am still
>> perplexed, because NDK has the audio support through OpenSLES, and it
>> gives also the support to sockets: so I initially thought that,
>> working on C language, I should operate on Kernel level bypassing all
>> the "Android Security Level".
>>
>> Next, I've read this article on source.android:
>>
>>
>> http://source.android.com/tech/security/#android-platform-security-architecture
>>
>> I'm not misunderstanding, all the applications are run inside a
>> "Application Sandbox", that it works in Kernel Mode. So, any attempt
>> to run a "particular application" with audio, sockets ecc. is vain. Is
>> there any way to bypass this "application sandbox"? Must I really use
>> .apks in order to use Manifest permissions? Thanks again.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Monty Python
>> <pythonexperiment at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just some ideas, (I never had this issue) but ... :
>>>
>>> It could be something with unix rights : on android, applications get
>>> permissions from their manifest and when android os creates the user of
>>> the
>>> sandbox for the app it adds this users to relevant groups.
>>> Because could also be something with the media server of android os that
>>> doesn't allow to use audio for not real android apps. So rather than
>>> command line launch you should probably try to use the sample application
>>> apk and install it properly. With "adb install your_apk_name.apk" .+
>>>
>>> Another possible root cause is that the emulator doesn't always play well
>>> with the audio layer. First it's absolutely not performant, and second
>>> sometimes it doesn't detects at all the host audio hardware. I would
>>> advise
>>> you to use a real device if you have one. It's way better to develop for
>>> the call / audio purpose. (However emulator is a solution to develop for
>>> the user interface part).
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>>
>>>> 2012/7/25 Monty Python <pythonexperiment at gmail.com>
>>>> I've also obtained the strace of the pjsua process, hoping that it
>>>> could expound my problem. Thanks again.
>>>> stat64("/vendor/lib/libstagefright_amrnb_common.so", 0xbea8f138) = -1
>>>> ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>>>> stat64("/system/lib/libstagefright_amrnb_common.so",
>>>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=50760, ...}) = 0
>>>> open("/system/lib/libstagefright_amrnb_common.so", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)
>>>> =
>>>> 3
>>>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_SET)                   = 0
>>>> read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\000"...,
>>>> 4096) = 4096
>>>> lseek(3, -8, SEEK_END)                  = 50752
>>>> read(3, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8)          = 8
>>>> mmap2(NULL, 53248, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
>>>> 0) = 0x40b0e000
>>>> mmap2(0x40b0e000, 46908, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED,
>>>> 3, 0) = 0x40b0e000
>>>> mprotect(0x40b0e000, 49152, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mmap2(0x40b1a000, 444, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
>>>> 0xc) = 0x40b1a000
>>>> close(3)                                = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40b0e000, 49152, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> stat64("/vendor/lib/libstagefright_enc_common.so", 0xbea8f138) = -1
>>>> ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>>>> stat64("/system/lib/libstagefright_enc_common.so",
>>>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5420, ...}) = 0
>>>> open("/system/lib/libstagefright_enc_common.so", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) =
>>>> 3
>>>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_SET)                   = 0
>>>> read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\000"...,
>>>> 4096) = 4096
>>>> lseek(3, -8, SEEK_END)                  = 5412
>>>> read(3, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8)          = 8
>>>> mmap2(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
>>>> 0) = 0x40b1b000
>>>> mmap2(0x40b1b000, 1700, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
>>>> 0) = 0x40b1b000
>>>> mprotect(0x40b1b000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mmap2(0x40b1c000, 260, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
>>>> 0x1) = 0x40b1c000
>>>> close(3)                                = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40b1b000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> stat64("/vendor/lib/libstagefright_avc_common.so", 0xbea8f138) = -1
>>>> ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>>>> stat64("/system/lib/libstagefright_avc_common.so",
>>>> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=21848, ...}) = 0
>>>> open("/system/lib/libstagefright_avc_common.so", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) =
>>>> 3
>>>> lseek(3, 0, SEEK_SET)                   = 0
>>>> read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\000"...,
>>>> 4096) = 4096
>>>> lseek(3, -8, SEEK_END)                  = 21840
>>>> read(3, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8)          = 8
>>>> mmap2(NULL, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
>>>> 0) = 0x40b1d000
>>>> mmap2(0x40b1d000, 19024, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED,
>>>> 3, 0) = 0x40b1d000
>>>> mprotect(0x40b1d000, 20480, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mmap2(0x40b22000, 256, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
>>>> 0x5) = 0x40b22000
>>>> close(3)                                = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40b1d000, 20480, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40574000, 1159168, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40071000, 155648, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x40106000, 4096, PROT_READ)   = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x4006e000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> mprotect(0x8000, 1933312, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>>>> sigaction(49264, {0xb00144c4, [], SA_RESTART}, {0xb00144c4, [],
>>>> SA_RESTART}, 0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>>>> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (f0) ---
>>>> open("/dev/log/main", O_WRONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
>>>> writev(3, [{"\7", 1}, {"libc\0", 5}, {"Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV) at
>>>> 0x0"..., 49}], 3) = 55
>>>> SYS_224(0x37, 0xbea8f850, 0x3, 0x38)    = 465
>>>> socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)         = 4
>>>> connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, path=@android:debuggerd}, 20) = 0
>>>> write(4, "?\1\0\0", 4)                  = 4
>>>> read(4, 0xbea8f888, 1)                  = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be
>>>> restarted)
>>>> --- SIGCONT (Continue) @ 0 (0) ---
>>>> read(4, "?", 1)                         = 1
>>>> close(4)                                = 0
>>>> sigaction(SIGSEGV, {SIG_DFL}, {0xb0005b29, [], SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO},
>>>> 0)
>>>> = 0
>>>> rt_sigreturn(0)                         = -1 EPERM (Operation not
>>>> permitted)
>>>> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (f0) ---
>>>> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Monty Python
>>>> <pythonexperiment at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings to everyone!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to compile pjsua using the following branch:
>>>>> http://svn.pjsip.org/repos/pjproject/branches/projects/android/. I've
>>>>> tried to do a push (adb push pjsua /data/local/) to my android-sdk
>>>>> emulator but, when I've tried to execute it via adb shell, the android
>>>>> logcat gave me the following SIGFAULT error: where am I wrong? Thanks
>>>>> in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> F/libc    (  464): Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV) at 0x000000f0 (code=1)
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
>>>>> *** *** ***
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): Build fingerprint:
>>>>> 'generic/sdk/generic:4.0.3/MR1/237985:eng/test-keys'
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): pid: 464, tid: 464  >>>
>>>>> ./pjsua-arm-unknown-linux-androideabi <<<
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault
>>>>> addr 000000f0
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  r0 ffffffff  r1 beef7c30  r2 beef7c30  r3 ffffffff
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  r4 00000000  r5 00000000  r6 00000000  r7 00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  r8 00000000  r9 00000000  10 00000000  fp 00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  ip 4003c4b9  sp beef7c60  lr 4003c4b1  pc b000469a
>>>>>   cpsr 00000030
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d0  00000000bd6bc8e3  d1  0000000000000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d2  0000000000000000  d3  0000000000000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d4  0000000000000000  d5  41c8f0a46e800000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d6  3f50624dd2f1a9fc  d7  c18af9670cce266f
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d8  0000000000000000  d9  0000000000000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d10 0000000000000000  d11 0000000000000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d12 0000000000000000  d13 0000000000000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  d14 0000000000000000  d15 0000000000000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):  scr 00000010
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):          #00  pc b000469a  /system/bin/linker
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):          #01  pc 000264ac  /system/lib/libc.so
>>>>
>>>> (__set_errno)
>>>>>
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): code around pc:
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): b0004678 95004840 44784a40 4d414b40 447b447a
>>>>> @H.. at JxD at KAMzD{D
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): b0004688 682d447d f44f9103 95017140 f0009402
>>>>> }D-h..O. at q......
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): b0004698 f8d4ff67 b10330f0 f8d44798 b17000e0
>>>>> g....0...G....p.
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): b00046a8 10e4f8d4 f7ff2200 2000f9b5 f8d4e007
>>>>> ....."..... ....
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): b00046b8 f04f20a8 f04230ff f8c40102 b00710a8  .
>>>>> O..0B.........
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): code around lr:
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): 4003c490 f240b507 9300736c 33fff04f 466b9301
>>>>> .. at .ls..O..3..kF
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): 4003c4a0 fd80f7ff bf00bd0e 4604b510 fe90f7ec
>>>>> ...........F....
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): 4003c4b0 f04f6004 bd1030ff 0ffff110 db02b510
>>>>> .`O..0..........
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): 4003c4c0 f7ff4240 bd10fff1 48214603 4478b5f0
>>>>> @B.......F!H..xD
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): 4003c4d0 b0976800 68022150 4620ac01 92154e1d
>>>>> .h..P!.h.. F.N..
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): stack:
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c20  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c24  4003c4c7  /system/lib/libc.so
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c28  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c2c  4002f477  /system/lib/libc.so
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c30  b00144c4
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c34  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c38  10000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c3c  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c40  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c44  4002f49b  /system/lib/libc.so
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c48  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c4c  0000c090
>>>>> /data/local/pjsua-arm-unknown-linux-androideabi
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c50  b00144c4
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c54  0000c070
>>>>> /data/local/pjsua-arm-unknown-linux-androideabi
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c58  df0027ad
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c5c  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33): #01 beef7c60  00000001
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c64  beef7d47  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c68  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c6c  beef7d6d  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c70  beef7d82  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c74  beef7d92  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c78  beef7dba  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c7c  beef7df7  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c80  beef7e10  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c84  beef7e2a  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c88  beef7f55  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c8c  beef7f68  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c90  beef7f83  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c94  beef7fa0  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c98  beef7fb3  [stack]
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7c9c  00000000
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7ca0  00000010
>>>>> I/DEBUG   (   33):     beef7ca4  000030d7
>>>>>
>>>>>     M.P.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>> pjsip mailing list
>>>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>>>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux