Problem using TCP as transport with ";transport=tcp"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Sundar Subramaniyan
<sundar.subramaniyan at gmail.com> wrote:
> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> 127.0.0.1:60000;rport=60000;received=127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bKPjiNeUsXjdMuRBU2j.KGSI94O1i7pQoYqc
> Call-ID: 2mdIf8lexOTBIMg2pPgKOBdDB3SowCcf
> From: <sip:127.0.0.1>;tag=PKcMBzp6yhIZQG-du1TsYkW1MPmX6L5V
> To: <sip:127.0.0.1>;tag=PKcMBzp6yhIZQG-du1TsYkW1MPmX6L5V
> CSeq: 124 INVITE
> Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE
> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1>;transport=tcp
>
>
> I noticed that once the route set is updated and frozen, the dialog->target
> is loaded with the URI present in the remote->contact_hdr->contact_uri.(not
> sure if the variable names are correct)
> It seems that while cloning the contact header, the ";transport=tcp" part is
> not cloned. I dont know if this is done purposefully. But I guess it is
> normal.
>
> So, even though the UAS sends the answer with required parameters, the UAC
> is not able to reply ACK in TCP transport.
>


Your 200/OK is malformed. If you want TCP, the Contact header should be:

  Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1;transport=tcp>

instead of

  Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1>;transport=tcp

 Benny



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux