RFC 5626 (Outbound) really supported?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I can tell for CSipSimple ;).

The option is not yet integrated to the application. It (should be) 
behind in pjsip but no ways to enable/disable it in the app yet (I'm not 
sure if it is in r944 but for sure it is in nightly builds).

Since nobody asked me for these options, I didn't take time to add these 
options in the UI. If someone need it, I can add options so that you can 
do more tests.

Regards,
R?gis

On 08/10/2011 20:19, I?aki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, AFAIK PJSIP is supposed to implement RFC 5626 "Managing
> Client-Initiated Connections" (AKA "Outbound" spec).
>
> If this feature is not implemented in the version of PJSIP used within
> CSipSimple or Blink softphones, then please tell it to me and just
> ignore the rest of the mail :)
>
>
> Using CSipSimple r944 I see a REGISTER like this (ommiting some headers):
>
> ----------
>    REGISTER sip:domain.net SIP/2.0
>    Contact: "Alice"<sip:ibc at 192.168.1.13:60461;transport=TCP;ob>
> ----------
>
> Such a REGISTER has nothing to do with the text of the draft. An
> example of really valid REGISTER implementing RFC 5626 appears in the
> RFC itself:
>
> ---------
>     REGISTER sip:example.com SIP/2.0
>     Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.0.2.2;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
>     Max-Forwards: 70
>     From: Bob<sip:bob@xxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=7F94778B653B
>     To: Bob<sip:bob at example.com>
>     Call-ID: 16CB75F21C70
>     CSeq: 1 REGISTER
>     Supported: path, outbound
>     Route:<sip:ep1.example.com;lr>
>     Contact:<sip:bob at 192.0.2.2;transport=tcp>;reg-id=1
>      ;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:00000000-0000-1000-8000-AABBCCDDEEFF>"
>     Content-Length: 0
> ---------
>
> Please note the "outbound" option tag in Supported header and the
> ;reg-id and ;+sip.instance header parameters in the Contact header.
>
>
> For sure, PJSIP implements it correctly but maybe both CSipSimple and
> Blink do not make usage of it, or they use a previous version of
> PJSIP. Am I right?
>
> Thanks a lot for the clarification.
>
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux