possible bug with refresher timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The "uac" in this context is the initiator of the transaction, thus the 
caller.   If the UAC indicated refresher=uas, then the receiver of the 
INVITE (callee) must be responsible for the refresh.

On 11/09/2011 01:33 AM, segalion wrote:
> The caller or the UAC?
>
> In http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4028.txt page 9 we can read:
>
> ...
>   The 'refresher' parameter will be present in the Session-Expires header field,
>
>     indicating who will perform the refreshes.  The UAC MUST set the
>     identity of the refresher to the value of this parameter.  If the
>     parameter contains the value 'uac', the UAC will perform them.
> ...
>
> But probably
>
>
> 2011/11/8 Joegen E. Baclor <joegen.baclor at gmail.com 
> <mailto:joegen.baclor at gmail.com>>
>
>     The caller needs to send the re-invite.  A timeout after 568 with
>     a negotiated expires of 600 is in order.
>
>
>
>     On 11/08/2011 07:51 PM, segalion wrote:
>>     I?ve been trying pjsua succesfully, and seems that I have a
>>     problem with incoming calls, and refresher interval...
>>
>>
>>     This is the brief:
>>
>>     12:07:28.798 <- The incoming INVITE has "Session-Expires: 600"
>>     12:07:28.798 -> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
>>     12:07:31.954  -> SIP/2.0 200 OK with "x: 600;refresher=uac"
>>     12:07:32.110 <- ACK
>>
>>
>>     The call is stablished...
>>
>>
>>     Some registers
>>     12:10:14.019 -> REGISTER
>>     12:10:14.159 <- SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>     ...
>>
>>
>>     And now the problem...
>>
>>      12:16:59.946    dlg00c29d18  No session refresh received after
>>     568s (expiration period=600s), stopping session now!
>>      12:16:59.946   -> BYE
>>      12:16:59.993 <- SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>      12:16:59.993    pjsua_app.c  Call 0 is DISCONNECTED [reason=408
>>     (Request Timeout)]
>>
>>
>>     An the call is closed in 10 minutes by pjsua !!!
>>
>>     Please, tellme if refresher=uac ? who has to make the reinvite?
>>     pjsua or network side?
>>
>>     Thanks in advance
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Visit our blog:http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>>     pjsip mailing list
>>     pjsip at lists.pjsip.org  <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>     http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20111109/0ba1ba10/attachment-0001.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux