Hi Vishal, The solution in the link you provided is referring to sipeksdk_mobile project directly. I only use the PJSip, so i don't think that i can use izmoto's solution. (or maybe i am missing something?) Do you work on iPhone? Regards, Maya On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Vishal Swami <vishal.s at net4.in> wrote: > Hi Maya , > > > > The solution provided by izmoto in the discussion > > http://groups.google.com/group/sipek/browse_thread/thread/4f511799d8354a22 > > > > works for me. > > > > Hope will be helpful to you too. > > > > * * > > *Regards,* > > * * > > *Vishal Swami > **--------------------------------------------------------------* > > *Team Leader Product **Development/ Engineering > **Net4India** Ltd** > **Corporate > D-25 Sector -3 N O I D A (INDIA) > Phone- +91 - 120 - 4323500 (218) > Mobile- +91 - 981- 00 -49276 > URL-**www.net4.in* <http://www.net4.in/>* > **--------------------------------------------------------------* > > *[image: cid:image002.jpg at 01C9B2F4.9E5EFF40]** **Please consider your > environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail.* > ------------------------------ > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you > are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you > must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any > information herein. If you have received this message in error, please > advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank > you for your cooperation. > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org [mailto: > pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Maya Zalcberg > *Sent:* Monday, March 08, 2010 5:26 PM > *To:* pjsip list > *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] incoming call problem > > > > Hi All, > Still no luck with the incoming call. > As I've mentioned before, the ongoing call is working fine. Therefore i > decided to compare the logs of both conversations, and i found out that the > differences between the two are these lines: > > 19:07:36.338 Master/sound Underflow, buf_cnt=0, will generate 1 frame > 19:07:36.362 Master/sound Underflow, buf_cnt=0, will generate 1 frame > 19:07:36.371 sound_port.c EC activated > 19:07:36.391 ec0x243e10 Underflow, buf_cnt=162, will generate 1 frame > 19:07:36.406 ec0x243e10 Underflow, buf_cnt=162, will generate 1 frame > 19:07:36.547 Master/sound Underflow, buf_cnt=0, will generate 1 frame > 19:07:36.970 strm0x879974 VAD re-enabled > 19:07:38.151 echo_suppress. Echo suppressor updated at t=006.550s, echo > tail=40 msec, factor min/avg=0.026/0.001 > 19:07:50.969 echo_suppress. Echo suppressor learning done at t=019.380s, > tail=40 ms, factor min/avg=0.022/0.142 > > In the outgoing call these lines appear after the state of the call was > changed to confirmed. in the incoming call, these methods didn't get called. > > Maybe it can help you understand what is the problem. > > Regards, > Maya > > > ------------------------------ > Message sent using India?s leading Hosted Microsoft Exchange service. > For details visit http://net4.in/hostedExchange > > ------------------------------ > Please consider the environment before printing. > -- Maya Zalcberg www.zemingo.com 972523328356 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20100308/e035fa86/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 843 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20100308/e035fa86/attachment-0001.jpe>
